USPTO serial 78468097
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Nataupsky, Esq.
STEVEN J NATAUPSKY ESQ KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-7216UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials; printed matter and publications including books, magazines, newsletters, brochures, leaflets, posters and timetables, stationery, members cards and application forms, manuals; directories, instructional and teaching material | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services; banking services; superannuation services; financial information services; issuing credit, debit, payment and smart cards; accepting and authorising financial transactions; credit, debit and smart card services; electronic funds transfer services; payment services using electronic and non-electronic means; on-line payment services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication and communication services; telecommunication of information (including web pages), computer programs and any other data; local, long distance and international voice, text, facsimile, video and data telecommunication services; television broadcasting including pay, free to air and cable; broadcasting services; data casting services; telecommunication services for the collection, transmission, processing and storage of messages and data; electronic mail services; voice mail and messaging services; SMS services; audio and video conferencing; provision of telecommunication access and links to computer databases and the Internet; rental of telecommunications apparatus, equipment and systems; telecommunications information services; providing information services concerning all of the foregoing; transmission of information on a wide range of topics, including on-line transmission; provision of telecommunications networks; telecommunications consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |