Drawing for QUEST

USPTO serial 78468252

QUEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul L. Havel

Paul L. Havel Miller Nash LLP601 Union StreetSuite 4400Seattle, WA 98101-2352

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing facilities for business events, namely, providing facilities for business meetings and trade exhibitionsACTIVE—
041Arranging and conducting tribal general social meetings and cultural festivals, providing casino and gaming facilities and services, namely, providing casino facilities and casinos, providing entertainment in the nature of gambling tournaments, live music, and live comedy; providing facilities for social, educational, entertainment events, namely, providing facilities for special events featuring casino and gaming contests and tournaments; providing live theatrical performances; providing live sporting events in the field of football; providing recreation facilities, namely, amusement centers and arcadesACTIVE—
043Providing facilities for social, educational, and entertainment, namely, providing facilities for exhibitionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 27, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 28, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 25, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 25, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 4, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 25, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 15, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 26, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 26, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 24, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 24, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 27, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 27, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 27, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 25, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 7, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 20, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 4, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 1, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 16, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 13, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 25, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance