USPTO serial 78468724
SANI-FLOOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SANI-FLOOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ARNOLD H. KRUMHOLZ
ARNOLD H KRUMHOLZ LERNER, DAVID, LITTENBERG, KRUMHOLZ & ME600 S AVE W STE 3WESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1497UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | FLOOR SANITIZING WIPES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |