USPTO serial 78469171
STRATEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STRATEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet M. Garetto
JANET M GARETTO JENKENS & GILCHRIST225 W WASHINGTON ST STE 2600CHICAGO, IL 60606-2418UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal scaffolding; metal scaffolding access and working platforms; metal scaffolding access towers; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |