USPTO serial 78469552
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Carlino
Mark A. Carlino Law Office of Mark A. Carlino, P.C.28150 N. Alma School Pkwy.Suite 103/PMB 617Scottsdale, AZ 85262| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, lipstick, lip gloss, lip liner, lip balm, blush, foundation, eye shadow, eye liner, mascara, concealer, cosmetic pencils, and facial powder; fragrances, namely, perfume, cologne, and after-shave lotion and gel; non-medicated skin care products, namely, soap, scrubs, toner, conditioner, exfoliants, skin clarifier, wrinkle removing skin care preparations, and moisturizer; face and body lotion, cream, oil, gel and spray; sun screen preparations, namely, lotion, cream, gel and spray; non-medicated face and body skin lightener; hair care products, namely, shampoo, conditioner, rinse, gel, mousse, spray and tonic; bath care products, namely, soap, salts, crystals, beads, gel, oil, powder, and bubble bath; scented head-to-toe body wash; nail care preparations, namely, cuticle cream, cuticle removing preparations, nail enamel, nail polish, nail polish remover, nail polish base coat, nail polish top coat, and nail strengtheners; personal deodorant; tooth whitening gels, creams, and pastes; non-medicated foot care products, namely scrubs, lotions, creams, deodorant, and exfoliants; men's toiletries, namely cologne, after-shave lotion and gel, skin cleanser, skin scrubs, skin toner, skin cream, shaving gel, shaving cream, toilet water, personal deodorant, shampoo, body lotion, body talc, and skin moisturizer; non-medicated baby care products, namely, lotions, creams, ointments, soaps, powders, and shampoo; facial and body hair depilatory waxes, creams, lotions, bleaching and coloring preparations; Make-up kits and gift sets comprised of one or more of lipstick, lip gloss, lip liner, lip balm, blush, foundation, eye shadow, eye liner, mascara, concealer, cosmetic pencils, and facial powder, fragrances, namely, perfume, cologne, and after-shave lotion and gel, non-medicated skin care products, namely, soap, scrubs, toner, conditioner, exfoliators, skin clarifier, wrinkle removing skin care preparations, and moisturizer, face and body lotion, cream, oil, gel and spray, sun screen preparations, namely, lotion, cream, gel, and spray, non-medicated face and body skin lightener, hair care products, namely, shampoo, conditioner, rinse, gel mousse, spray and tonic, bath care products, namely, soap, salts, crystals, beads, gel oil, powder, and bubble bath, scented head-to-toe body wash, nail care preparations, namely, cuticle cream, cuticle removing preparations, nail enamel, nail polish, nail polish remover, nail polish base coat, nail polish top coat, and nail strengtheners, personal deodorant, tooth whitening gels, creams, and pastes, non-medicated foot care products, namely, scrubs, lotions, creams, deodorant, and exfoliators, men's toiletries, namely, cologne, after-shave lotion and gel, skin cleanser, skin scrubs, skin toner, skin cream, shaving gel, shaving cream, toilet water, personal deodorant, shampoo, body lotion, body talc and skin moisturizer, non-medicated baby care products, namely, lotions, creams, ointments, soaps, powders and shampoo, facial and body hair depilatory waxes, creams, lotions, bleaching and coloring preparations | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 26, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |