USPTO serial 78469792
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Greg Gemignani
GREG GEMIGNANI LIONEL SAWYER & COLLINS LTD300 S 4TH ST STE 1700LAS VEGAS, NV 89101-6053UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Hotels, restaurants, bar services, catering services, providing facilities for conventions, banquets, social functions, fund raising, and special events | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |