Drawing for TC 330

USPTO serial 78470056

TC 330

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAKAI, ADA HAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TC 330?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ursula B. Day

Ursula B. Day Law Firm of Ursula B. Day708 Third AvenueSuite 1501New York, NY 10017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006LARGE TRANSPORT AND STORAGE CONTAINERS FOR LIQUID OR GRANULATE FILLINGS, STORAGE TANKS, INTERMEDIATE BULK CONTAINERS (= IBC), METAL ROD GRIDS FOR PALLET CONTAINERS FOR USE AS SIDE WALL PROTECTION, STEEL PALLETS, MULTI TRIP PALLET CONTAINERS, ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE PALLET CONTAINERS, PALLET CONTAINERS WITH VIEWING STRIPES AND FILLING SCALES, TIGHT HEAD BARRELS, LIDDED BARRELS, OPEN TOP DRUMS, CANISTERS FOR STORAGE, ALL AFORE-MENTIONED GOODS MADE AT LEAST PARTIALLY OF METALACTIVE—
020LARGE TRANSPORT AND STORAGE CONTAINERS FOR LIQUID OR GRANULATE FILLINGS, STORAGE TANKS, INTERMEDIATE BULK CONTAINERS (=IBC), TRANSPORT PALLETS, MULTI TRIP PALLET CONTAINERS, ELECTRICALLY CONDUCTIVE PALLET CONTAINERS, PALLET CONTAINERS WITH VIEWING STRIPES AND FILLING SCALES, TIGHT HEAD BARRELS, L-RING DRUMS, LIDDED BARRELS, OPEN TOP DRUMS, HOBBOCKS AKA LARGE BUCKETS, JERRYCANS FOR STORAGE, CANISTERS FOR STORAGE, ALL AFORE-MENTIONED GOODS MADE AT LEAST PARTIALLY OF PLASTICACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 22, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 1, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 11, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 6, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance