USPTO serial 78470411
REDWOOD BIOTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLANDU, FLORENTINA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REDWOOD BIOTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig M. Stainbrook
Craig M. Stainbrook Stainbrook & Stainbrook, LLP412 Aviation Blvd., Suite HSanta Rosa, CA 95403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | rapid diagnostic screening devices, namely, screening devices for the qualitative detection of multiple drugs and drug metabolites in urine; self-contained, non-intrusive alcohol screening devices; urine specimen collection cups and dipping devices for use in lateral flow chromatographic immunoassay for the qualitative detection of multiple drugs and drug metabolites in urine; and screening devices, namely, urinalysis reagent strips, throat swabs, fecal occult blood test cassettes, urine pregnancy test strips, urine pregnancy cassette devices, urine-serum pregnancy cassette devices, and h; pylori cassette devices | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |