USPTO serial 78470423
CARBONXT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3791552Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 18, 2010
- Examiner
- IN, SUNG HYUN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CARBONXT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EARLWOOD, NSW, AU
Charleston, WV
Charleston, WV
Gainesville, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Halina S. Dziewit
Halina S. Dziewit Patton Boggs LLP1801 California Street; Suite 4900Denver, CO 80202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | recovered/recycled carbon from coal waste; carbon waste and carbonaceous ore; processed carbon; treated carbon; activated carbon; carbon black; granular carbon; carbon fines; carbon powder; carbon flakes; micronized carbon; metallurgical carbon and coking material; carbon foam; synthetic graphite; carbon, all for use in the manufacture or production of a wide variety of goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2009 |
| 004 | Carbon based fuel; carbon materials, namely, graphite lubricants; processed coal; treated coal; coal and coke by-products; coal tar oil; and carbon feed stocks, namely, coal; synthetic graphite for use as a lubricant | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2009 |
| 009 | Anodes; electrodes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2009 |
| 040 | Refining and conversion of any and all varieties of coal and carbon and carbonaceous ores and lignites and coal wastes; production of refined carbon and any and all varieties of coal and carbonaceous ores and lignites and coal waste; production of by-products from processing carbon and any and all varieties of coal and coal waste and carbonaceous ore and lignites; processing of any and all varieties of coal and carbon and carbonaceous ore and lignites and coal wastes for the production of energy | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2009 |
| 042 | research and development activities for the prospective production of products from processing carbon, and any and all varieties of coal, and coal waste and carbonaceous ore and lignites | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 30, 2009 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CARBONXT GROUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Carbonxt, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Carbonxt, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CARBONXT GROUP LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CARBONXT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2010 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 14, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2009 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 24, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |