USPTO serial 78470703
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael F. Snyder
MICHAEL F. SNYDER VOLPE AND KOENIG, P.C.30 SOUTH 17TH STREETSUITE 1600PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4009| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Articles of leather and imitations of leather, namely, paintball equipment bags, paintball equipment backpacks, paintball barrel bags and paintball equipment duffel bags, all of the foregoing sold through paintball equipment distributors | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Paintball ammunition, paintball marker guns, and paintball marker gun accessories, namely, valve pins, front bolts, velocity adjusters, expansion chambers, barrels, trigger frames, barrel adaptors, power feed adaptors, marker scopes, marker covers, marker holsters, cocking bolts, sight rails, springs, o-rings, turbo valves, air tanks, ball detents, sears, actuator rods, air block screws, shafts, push pins, air regulators, grips, elbows, butt plates; paintball accessories, namely, face masks, loaders, guppies, harnesses, throat deflectors, chest deflectors, knee pads for athletic use, elbow pads for athletic use | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 23, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 3, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |