USPTO serial 78471170
SIGREASE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SIGREASE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-65203 Wiesbaden, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph E. Locher
RALPH E LOCHER LERNER & GREENBERG PAPO BOX 2480HOLLYWOOD, FL 33022-2480UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Lubricant for graphite electrodes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2006 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |