Drawing for GRINS PARTY KITS

USPTO serial 78471335

GRINS PARTY KITS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GRINS PARTY KITS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028PARTY KITS COMPRISED OF AN INFLATABLE TOY PARTY THEME STRUCTURE, FOR CHILDREN, WITH INTERCHANGEABLE PANELS, PARTY GAMES, PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL TOYS, PAPER GIFT BAGS, PAPER NAPKINS, PAPER PLATES AND PAPER CUPSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 3, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 22, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 17, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Dec 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 9, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 22, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 29, 2006PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Aug 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jun 2, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 11, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 4, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 4, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance