Drawing for MORPHOLOGI

USPTO serial 78471663

MORPHOLOGI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3119232Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 25, 2006
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with MORPHOLOGI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*

Plus Government fees of $850

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erik N. Lund

Erik N. Lund Whitestone Law PLLC8000 Westpark Drive. Suite 250Mclean, VA 22102United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical, optical, [ rheological,] image analytical, [ acoustical, ultrasonic ] and/or laser scientific and laboratory instruments for particle identifying, sizing, counting, classifying, differentiating, and grading, for measuring particle [ speeds, mobility, and ] distribution, and for monitoring airborne or pneumatically carried particles in liquid or gases; particle analyzers for grading and measuring concentrations of accumulations of particles; absorption scattering instruments employing UV-vis-IR optical absorption, [ ultrasonic absorption, and turbidity monitoring, ] for measuring real time of particle properties, transmitters and receivers, ejectors, dryers, and separators; monitoring and control instruments for grading, namely,[ laser diffraction ] size grading; particle mobility measuring instruments, environmental monitoring instruments, [ pH measuring instruments;] instruments to determine the molecular weight of polymers, namely, air and liquid particle counters, photon correlation spectroscopy instruments, micro electrophoresis measuring instruments, acoustic spectroscopy instruments, laser diffraction measuring instruments, all for use in clinical, biological, industrial, medical, academic and/or scientific research and commercial laboratories; [ diffraction measuring apparatus and instruments, namely, particle size, shape, and composition distribution analysers; sedimentation, sieve, diffraction, and zeta potential laboratory instruments;] apparatus for preparing samples, suspensions, sprays, emulsions of particles for use with any of the aforesaid goods, namely, sample dispersion units, stirred cells, autosamplers, dry powder feeders, autotitrators, nebulizers, ultrasonic baths, temperature controllers, sample grabbers, extractors, fluidisers, dispensers, diluters, concentrators, separators, dispersion units, measurement cells, auto-sampling units, automated preparation stages; control systems, namely, electrical controllers, computer hardware and computer software for controlling all of the aforesaid goods and for controlling copier and powder quality; replacement parts for the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 5, 2026COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED—
Oct 5, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 20, 2026ES7RTEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2016NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Oct 11, 2016RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Oct 11, 201689AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Oct 7, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 25, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2011NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Dec 16, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 3, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 2, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 21, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 17, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 18, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 9, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance