USPTO serial 78472054
A WORLD BEYOND THE ORDINARY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with A WORLD BEYOND THE ORDINARY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christine L. Lofgren, Esq.
CHRISTINE L LOFGREN ESQ JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO LLP1900 AVE OF THE STARS FL 7LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4308UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTION OF TOURISM FOR OTHERS IN THE AREA OF BRITISH COLUMBIA | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | PROVISION OF TOURISM INFORMATION ON TOURISM MARKETS, TRENDS, EMPLOYMENT, PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES AND ON AVAILABILITY AND SUITABILITY OF INFRASTRUCTURE AND OF SERVICES THAT SUPPORT TOURISM ACTIVITIES; PROVISION OF TOURISM INFORMATION FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA; TRANSPORTATION RESERVATION SERVICES; RESERVATION SERVICES FOR SITE SEEING TOURS AND OUTDOOR ADVENTURE TOURS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | RESERVATION SERVICES FOR LOCAL ATTRACTIONS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA, NAMELY SHOWS, ENTERTAINMENT EVENTS AND SPORTS EVENTS; ENHANCING PROFESSIONALISM AND FACILITATING THE CREATION OF JOBS IN THE TOURISM INDUSTRY THROUGH EDUCATION SERVICES, NAMELY, TRAINING SERVICES FOR THE TOURISM AND HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING ACCREDITATION PROGRAMS FOR PURPOSES OF ENHANCING STANDARDS OF TOURIST ACCOMMODATIONS, FACILITIES, SERVICES AND AMENITIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | RESERVATION SERVICES FOR SPAS AND WELLNESS CENTERS, NAMELY, RESERVATIONS FOR TEMPORARY ACCOMMODATIONS AND MEALS TO CLIENTS OF A HEALTH OR BEAUTY SPA; ACCOMMODATIONS RESERVATION SERVICES, NAMELY MAKING HOTEL, MOTEL, INN, RESORT, LODGE, BED AND BREAKFAST, CAMP GROUND, RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK AND HOUSE BOAT RESERVATIONS FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | RESERVATION SERVICES FOR SPAS AND WELLNESS CENTERS, NAMELY, RESERVATIONS FOR HEALTH SPA SERVICES FOR HEALTH AND WELLNESS OF THE BODY AND SPIRIT OFFERED AT A HEALTH RESORT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tourism British Columbia
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named A WORLD BEYOND THE ORDINARY
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 1, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 21, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |