Drawing for SAGECLIFFE

USPTO serial 78472545

SAGECLIFFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAGECLIFFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vincent E. Bryan III

VINCENT E BRYAN III MONTAGE MANAGEMENT8015 SE 28TH ST STE 212MERCER ISLAND, WA 98040UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Golf club services; recreational services in the nature of horseback riding facilitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 3, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 3, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 3, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 10, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 26, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 12, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 5, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 27, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2006IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2006INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Mar 3, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 14, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 25, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 1, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance