USPTO serial 78472642
COLOR WAVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLOR WAVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David N. Johnson, Esq.
LISA M SCHUVER HALLMARK CARDS, INCORPORATED2501 MCGEE TRAFFICWAYLEGAL DEPT MD#339KANSAS CITY, MO 64108-2600Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Markers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 23, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |