Drawing for COMMON SENSE FOR THE COMMON GOOD

USPTO serial 78472844

COMMON SENSE FOR THE COMMON GOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COMMON SENSE FOR THE COMMON GOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry F. Soalt

Barry F. Soalt Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035promoting public awareness of the need to address a variety of social concerns, namely healthcare, healthy lifestyles, drug regulation, fiscal responsibility of government, education, democracy and elections, social security, trade, war and peace, international relations, and environmental protection; lobbying to advocate changes in legislation regarding a variety of issues of general public interest, namely promoting the interests of Americans with respect to healthcare, healthy lifestyles, drug regulation, fiscal responsibility of government, education, democracy and elections, social security, trade, war and peace, international relations, and environmental protection; political action committee services, namely, promoting the interests of Americans with respect to healthcare, healthy lifestyles, drug regulation, fiscal responsibility of government, education, democracy and elections, social security, trade, war and peace, international relations, and environmental protectionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 28, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 28, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 3, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 3, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 3, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 3, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 4, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 4, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 4, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 4, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 7, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 6, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance