Drawing for XLR PROCESSOR

USPTO serial 78472856

XLR PROCESSOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XLR PROCESSOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Integrated circuitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 1, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2008ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 31, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2008COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2008PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 7, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 19, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 2, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 10, 2007CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Mar 7, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2007PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Dec 29, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 28, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 14, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 6, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2004COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 31, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance