Drawing for THE HIGHWAY ONE WINE COMPANY

USPTO serial 78472889

THE HIGHWAY ONE WINE COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, JASON E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE HIGHWAY ONE WINE COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Baker

STEPHEN L BAKER BAKER AND RANNELLS PA575 ROUTE 28SUITE 102RARITAN, NJ 08869

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Bottle stoppers made of glass; Wine glasses; Cheese boards; Coasters, not of paper and not being table linen; Decanters; Coolers for wine; Wine racks; Thermal insulated tote bags for food or beverages; Wine bottle foil cutters; Corkscrews; Cork pullersACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, aprons, shirts, T-shirts, caps, jacketsACTIVE—
033WineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 13, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 19, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 19, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 1, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 12, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 31, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 31, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance