CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MONITOR ISM INTEGRATED SECURITY MANAGER

USPTO serial 78473288

MONITOR ISM INTEGRATED SECURITY MANAGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONITOR ISM INTEGRATED SECURITY MANAGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

TERRENCE J. MCALLISTER

TERRENCE J MCALLISTER OHLANDT, GREELEY, RUGGIERO & PERLE LLP10TH FLONE LANDMARK SQSTAMFORD, CT 06901-2682

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer controlled surveillance systems comprising computer-based configuration and surveillance base stations, digital video cameras, electrical security controllers and related security surveillance computer hardware, peripherals and component parts and fittings therefore for use in providing fire, gas, anti-intrusion alarm and central alarm surveillance, controlling building lighting, and granting access to security systems recordsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 17, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 13, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 3, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance