USPTO serial 78473359
HEMRICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HEMRICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Dix Hills, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert Wai-Kit Chan
ALBERT WAI-KIT CHAN DEHENG CHEN CHAN LLCWORLD PLZ STE 604 141-07 20TH AVEWHITESTONE, NY 11357UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, down-padded anoraks, down jackets, men and women jackets, coats, vests, denim jackets, cotton jackets, leather jackets, rain jackets, waterproof jackets, wind resistant jackets, sports jackets, leisure jackets; headgear, namely headbands, bathing caps; shirts, namely, knit shirts, polo shirts, sports shirts, golf shirts, T-shirts, blouses, cotton shirts; night shirts; skirts, namely, jeans skirts and denim skirts, cotton skirts pants, namely, jeans pants and denim pants, snow pants, ski pants, sweat pants cotton pants, capri pants, sports pants; hats, namely, caps, bonnets, ski hats; socks, namely, anklets, cotton socks; undergarments, namely, panties, briefs, cotton panties, cotton briefs, brassieres, bloomers, bottoms, boxer shorts, breeches, under shirts, underwear, stockings; clothing accessories, namely, ties, cravats, belts, gloves, aprons, berets, ear muffs; children's wear, namely tops, children's shirts, children's pants, children's shorts, one-piece sets, children's skirts, children's dresses, and children's jackets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |