Drawing for ROAD ANGEL

USPTO serial 78473468

ROAD ANGEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROAD ANGEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Pickerill

JOHN PICKERILL FREDRIKSON & BYRON200 S 6TH ST STE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, a television series in the field of children's entertainment, live performances featuring costumed characters, production of cartoons; publication of books; production of radio programs, television programs and a television series, theatrical productions; production of sound recordings, production of video recordings and video disc recordings, production of films, production of compact discs and CD ROMs; providing on-line entertainment for children in the nature of stories and gamesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 24, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 23, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Aug 19, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Aug 19, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 5, 2010EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Feb 19, 2010EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Feb 19, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Sep 14, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 19, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 19, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 19, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 19, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 19, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 19, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 19, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 25, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 31, 2007PGOAPETITION GRANTED - REMAIL OFFICE ACTION
Jul 9, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Jul 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 8, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 7, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 30, 2006GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED
Sep 30, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED
Sep 8, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 16, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 7, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance