USPTO serial 78473491
WINDSORTECH, INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WINDSORTECH, INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan M Burger, Esq.
ALAN M BURGER ESQ BURGER, TRAILOR & FARMER PA1601 FORUM PL STE 404WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401-8103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | WindsorTech, Inc; is a Data Security and Environmental Compliance Services Company assisting Corporate America effectively handle the liability issues of their end-of-life IT Assets; WindsorTech offers both highly customized and turnkey programs for end-of-life IT Assets; Our TSP programs present Data Erasure, System Audits/Asset Tracking, Environmental Compliance, and IT Asset Remarketing services in one simple, comprehensive, and affordable package | ACTIVE | Aug 16, 2001 |
| 041 | Education relating to data erasure and liability associated with data release Education relating to computer hardware | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2004 |
| 042 | Sale and services relating to enterprise and midrange computers and servers, systems and networking equipment | ACTIVE | Sep 30, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |