Drawing for ROUTE 58 SPECIALTIES

USPTO serial 78473521

ROUTE 58 SPECIALTIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TIERNEY, MARGERY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROUTE 58 SPECIALTIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ian D. Titley

IAN D TITLEY11357 NUCKOLS RD #173GLEN ALLEN, VA 23059UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029salted peanuts, unsalted shelled peanuts, roasted-in-the-shell peanuts, salted-in-the-shell peanuts, redskin peanuts, Cajun spiced peanuts, garlic peanuts, honey roasted peanuts, hickory smoked peanuts, and roasted cashews and pistachiosABANDONED—
030candy and peanut confections, namely, peanut squares, butter toffee peanuts, peanut brittle, chocolate covered peanuts and peanut butter fudgeABANDONED—
031Raw peanuts and unprocessed peanutsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2006ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Jun 7, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 24, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 15, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 4, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 4, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 4, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 3, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 1, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance