USPTO serial 78473820
ADVANTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADVANTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Spring House, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter T. Wakiyama, Esquire
PETER T WAKIYAMA ESQ WOLF BLOCK SCHORR & SOLIS-COHEN LLP1650 ARCH ST FL 22PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business marketing and consulting services and advertising services; namely, direct mail marketing of goods for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 6, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |