Drawing for OAKLEY THUMP

USPTO serial 78473961

OAKLEY THUMP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNYDER, NELSON B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OAKLEY THUMP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet Robertson Kaufman

JANET ROBERTSON KAUFMAN WEEKS, KAUFMAN,NELSON & JOHNSON462 STEVENS AVE STE 310SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075-2066UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Protective eyewear, namely spectacles, prescription eyewear, anti glare glasses and sunglasses and their parts and accessories, namely replacement lenses, frames, earstems, and nose pieces; cases specially adapted for spectacles and sunglasses and their parts and accessories; portable digital electronic device for recording, organizing, and reviewing text, data and audio files; computer software for use in recording, organizing, and reviewing text, data and audio files on portable digital electronic devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 10, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 10, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance