USPTO serial 78474235
WE DOT EVERY I...
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WE DOT EVERY I...?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward R. Weingram
Edward R. Weingram Schweitzer Cornman Gross & Bondell LLP292 Madison Avenue - 19th FloorNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING AND APPAREL, NAMELY, UNIFORMS, VESTS, TUNICS, SHIRTS, PANTS, SLACKS, TROUSERS, SKORTS, SHORTS, SKIRTS, BLOUSES, FROCKS, SUITS, DRESSES, JUMP SUITS, WARM-UPS, COATS, JACKETS, BLAZERS, CARDIGANS, SWEATERS, GOWNS, SMOCKS, APRONS, HATS, CAPS, NECKERCHIEFS, SCARVES, ASCOTS BANDANAS, GLOVES AND TIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |