USPTO serial 78474383
CERTIDO A CARITOR OFFERING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, DAYNA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CERTIDO A CARITOR OFFERING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Ramon, CA
San Ramon, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold V Stotland
Harold V Stotland SEYFARTH SHAW LLPSuite 2400131 S. Dearborn StreetChicago, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for operating systems, data-base management, firewalls, debugging and anti-virus, word processing, spreadsheets, graphics, games, data-recovery and Internet filtering, all for use in the business, financial services, travel, manufacturing, telecommunications, legal services, retail, transportation, defense and energy industries; computer firmware for operating systems, data-base management, firewalls, debugging and anti-virus, word processing, data-recovery and Internet filtering, all for use in the business, financial services, travel, manufacturing, telecommunications, legal services, retail, transportation, defense and energy industries; computer hardware; computers; computer peripherals; computer programs, namely, computer utility programs, computer operating systems programs, computer firewall programs, computer debugging and anti-virus programs, computer data recovery programs and computer Internet filtering programs, computer applications programs word processing, graphics, spreadsheets, databases and games; printers; and parts for all the aforementioned goods; accessories for the aforementioned goods, namely printer stands, power adaptors, wrist rests, scanners, mouse mats, screen shields and joy sticks | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management services; business consultancy services;management consultancy services; database management, namely, compilation and systemization of information into computer databases; provision of business information and advice; management and operation of telephone call centers for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education and provision of training, namely, conducting classes, seminars and workshops in the field of computer programming, and in the usage of computers, computer software, firmware and hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consultancy services; computer programming; design of computer software, firmware and hardware; computer system design; computer systems analysis services; maintenance, repair and installation of computer software; rental of computers and computer software; advisory services relating to all the aforementioned; provision of information relating to all the aforementioned services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Caritor, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Caritor, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CERTIDO A CARITOR OFFERING
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 28, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | PBER | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |