USPTO serial 78474398
EXPRESS PORTFOLIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPRESS PORTFOLIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alexander Tognino
ALEXANDER TOGNINO INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPN CASTLE DRINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & LICENSINGARMONK, NY 10504Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE; OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE FOR COMPUTERS AND SERVERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CONNECTING DISPARATE COMPUTER SYSTEMS, SERVERS AND STORAGE DEVICES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, AND PROCESSES THAT EXIST WITHIN AN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENT; ALL FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH AN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR SMALL TO MID-SIZE BUSINESSES NEEDS; AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITH | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, updating and maintenance of computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA AND DOCUMENTS VIA COMPUTER TERMINALS; PROVIDING MULTIPLE-USER ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK; ALL FOR USE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH AN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEM DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR SMALL TO MID-SIZE BUSINESSES NEEDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer systems integration services; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and computer software problems; computer systems design services for others; computer systems analysis; computer software and hardware testing services; installation, updating and maintenance of computer software; computer programming for others; computer consultation services; all for use solely in connection with an information technology system designed specifically for small to mid-size businesses needs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by International Business Machines Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by International Business Machines Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EXPRESS PORTFOLIO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 29, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |