Drawing for ELLACTIVA

USPTO serial 78474687

ELLACTIVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELLACTIVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Craig J.J. Snyder

CRAIG J J SNYDER CRAIG J J SNYDER PC67 WALL ST STE 2211NEW YORK, NY 10005-3101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary supplementsACTIVE
030Bread, bread sticks, food package combinations consisting primarily of bread, crackers or cookies; biscuits; cookies; crackers; ready to eat, cereal based food bars; ready to eat, rice based food bars; ready to eat, rice derived snacks, ready to eat, cereal derived snacks; pastas; entrees consisting primarily of rice or pasta; candy; candy bars; and sandwichesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2007PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Apr 3, 2007PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Apr 3, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Feb 20, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 6, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 4, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Apr 4, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Apr 4, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 12, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 22, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 1, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 1, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance