Drawing for JS

USPTO serial 78474891

JS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gordon E. R. Troy

GORDON E R TROY GORDON E R TROY PCPO BOX 368CHARLOTTE, VT 05445-0368UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Semi-precious and precious stones; jewelry, namely, necklaces, pendants, bracelets, rings, earrings, and brooches; jewelry of precious and non-precious metals; jewelry of precious and semiprecious gemstonesACTIVENov 1, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Jul 18, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jul 17, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
May 12, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
May 12, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
May 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 28, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 3, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance