Drawing for C COALESCENT TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 78475448

C COALESCENT TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3084569Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 25, 2006
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with C COALESCENT TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Sigalow,

DAVID SIGALOW ALLEN, DYER, DOPPELTMILBRATH & GILCHRIST PA255 S ORANGE AVE STE 1401ORLANDO, FL 32801

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042engineeringSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 6, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)
Apr 25, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 8, 2006DP1B1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION
Mar 6, 2006IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED
Mar 6, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 6, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 22, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 22, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 22, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 11, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2005GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Apr 7, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Mar 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 7, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance