USPTO serial 78475756
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Bakersfield, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher Finberg, Esq.
CHRISTOPHER FINBERG ESQ JONES & BEARDSLEY PC10000 STOCKDALE HWY STE 350BAKERSFIELD, CA 93311-3607UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Real estate marketing services, namely, published materials marketing real property; Real estate advertising services; Providing information about the trading of specific real properties | ACTIVE | May 15, 1997 |
| 036 | Real estate brokerage; Real estate acquisition services; Real estate investment; Providing information in the field of real estate by means of linking to web pages featuring real estate information | ACTIVE | May 15, 1997 |
| 037 | Land development services, namely, planning and laying out residential and/or commercial communities; Real estate development; erecting of housing areas and commercial buildings | ACTIVE | May 15, 1997 |
| 041 | Golf courses; Providing golf facilities; Providing facilties for recreational activites; Providing sports facilities | ACTIVE | May 15, 1997 |
| 043 | Restaurant services; Bar services; Providing food and drinks | ACTIVE | May 15, 1997 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |