USPTO serial 78475892
ZIRKOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZIRKOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacey C Kalamaras, Esq.
Stacey C Kalamaras, Esq. Kalamaras Law Office LLC4740 N. Cumberland Ave #309Chicago, IL 60656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | zirconium core for ceramic dental crowns | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 3, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |