USPTO serial 78475942
THE WIRENUT AMERICA'S EXPERT ELECTRICIAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE WIRENUT AMERICA'S EXPERT ELECTRICIAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Colorado Springs, CO
Colorado Springs, CO
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | ELECTRICAL REPAIRS, INSTALLATION AND CONTRACTING SERVICES FOR RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL WIRING OF ELECTRICAL APPARATUSES, APPLIANCES, STEREO COMPONENTS, AND TELEVISION COMPONENTS, ELECTRICAL PANELS, ELECTRICAL OUTLETS, SWITCHES AND LIGHT FIXTURES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 23, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |