CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SALON NETWORK BY ESSENCE

USPTO serial 78476240

SALON NETWORK BY ESSENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SALON NETWORK BY ESSENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul A. Lee

Paul A. Lee Time Inc.1271 Avenue of the Americas11th FloorNew York, NY 10020

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Providing online information in the field of trade information for African-American stylists and their clientsACTIVE—
044Providing online information in the field of resources, namely, information in the field of hair styling, for African-American stylists and their clientsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 30, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 6, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 9, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 5, 2007ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
May 4, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 4, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 24, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 24, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 21, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 6, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED—
Oct 21, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 4, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance