USPTO serial 78476664
INTEGRUS TITLE & CLOSING SERVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTEGRUS TITLE & CLOSING SERVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Hilary Harp
HILARY HARP POWELL GOLDSTEIN LLP1201 W PEACHTREE ST NW 14TH FLATLANTA, GA 30303-3488UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 22, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 22, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 22, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |