Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78476723?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78476723. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns FRESH SOURCE?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78476723, the listed owner(s) include: PPC Marketing, Ltd., PPC Marketing, Ltd..

What is USPTO serial number 78476723?

Serial number 78476723 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark FRESH SOURCE. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

Which trademark classes cover FRESH SOURCE?

The public record lists International Classes: 029. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78476723

FRESH SOURCE

Q: What is the current status of FRESH SOURCE?

FRESH SOURCE (78476723) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: Aug 31, 2004
Status date: Apr 25, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: FOSTER, STEVEN
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH SOURCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

PPC Marketing, Ltd.
Pittsburgh, TX
Other trademarks owned by PPC Marketing, Ltd.
PPC Marketing, Ltd.
Pittsburgh, TX
Other trademarks owned by PPC Marketing, Ltd.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

S. Roxanne Edwards

S. Roxanne Edwards Baker & McKenzie LLP2300 Trammell Crow Center2001 Ross AvenueDallas, TX 75201

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
029	chicken	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Jun 26, 2008	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jun 26, 2008	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2008	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2007	EX2G	SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED	—
Oct 24, 2007	EXT2	SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED	—
Oct 24, 2007	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 17, 2007	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 17, 2007	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Apr 18, 2007	EX1G	SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED	—
Apr 18, 2007	EXT1	SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED	—
Apr 18, 2007	EEXT	SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED	The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 24, 2006	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 1, 2006	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 12, 2006	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Jun 15, 2006	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Apr 21, 2006	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Apr 19, 2006	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Apr 19, 2006	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Apr 5, 2006	ATRQ	ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED	—
Apr 3, 2006	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Apr 3, 2006	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Apr 3, 2006	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Apr 2, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 2, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 3, 2005	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 3, 2005	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 2005	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 23, 2005	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 23, 2005	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 29, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 25, 2004	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Sep 10, 2004	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—