USPTO serial 78476945
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim
RICHARD Y. KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP600 13TH ST NW STE 1200WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used to configure, allocate, integrate and manage distributed and parallel computing and processor loads over computer networks; computer software for enhancing distributed and parallel processing power, run time and speed over computer networks; distributed and parallel processing computer software; computer software used to migrate software applications between computer platforms; and user manuals and guides sold as a unit therewith | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |