Drawing for ASPEED SOFTWARE

USPTO serial 78476945

ASPEED SOFTWARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ASPEED SOFTWARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard Y. Kim

RICHARD Y. KIM MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP600 13TH ST NW STE 1200WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software used to configure, allocate, integrate and manage distributed and parallel computing and processor loads over computer networks; computer software for enhancing distributed and parallel processing power, run time and speed over computer networks; distributed and parallel processing computer software; computer software used to migrate software applications between computer platforms; and user manuals and guides sold as a unit therewithABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 17, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION
Mar 15, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
Mar 15, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Mar 15, 2008OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Feb 2, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Oct 31, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 4, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 29, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 22, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jul 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jul 21, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 8, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance