Drawing for PROPHET/VALIDATOR

USPTO serial 78477220

PROPHET/VALIDATOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PROPHET/VALIDATOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alfred C. Frawley

ALFRED C FRAWLEY PRETI FLAHERTYPO BOX 9546PORTLAND, ME 04112-9546UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, business performance software with capabilities for predicting system performance problems, analyzing data and resource utilization, setting short and long term performance goals, and comparing predicted performance with actual performance resultsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 27, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 20, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Sep 4, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 11, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Dec 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 28, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 28, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 6, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Apr 6, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 30, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance