CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BOARD CERTIFIED MEDICAL AESTHETIC SPECIALIST (BCMAS)

USPTO serial 78477603

BOARD CERTIFIED MEDICAL AESTHETIC SPECIALIST (BCMAS)

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOARD CERTIFIED MEDICAL AESTHETIC SPECIALIST (BCMAS)?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen L. Humphrey

Stephen L. Humphrey CAMERON & HORNBOSTEL LLP818 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 700Suite 700WASHINGTON, DC 20006-2722

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
BMedical services in the field of aestheticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 27, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 27, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 21, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 15, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 3, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 3, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 3, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 6, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 6, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 3, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 3, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 7, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 13, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 24, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 18, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance