Drawing for DUNHILL SPORT

USPTO serial 78477715

DUNHILL SPORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUNHILL SPORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE E APOLZON

LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018shoe bags, sports bags, sports holdall bags; umbrellasACTIVE
024towels, golf towels, textile clothing labelsACTIVE
025clothing, namely, shirts, blousons, trousers, t-shirts, polo shirts; woven/knitted clothing, namely, shirts, cardigans, vests, tank-tops, pullovers; sports clothing, namely, golf shirts, golf trousers; socks, belts, golf belts, golf shoes; rain jackets, rain trousers, wind resistant jackets; footwear; headgear, namely, hats and caps; sun visorsACTIVE
028golf apparatus, namely, golf bags, golf club covers, bags specifically adapted for sports equipment, golf glovesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 18, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 13, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 8, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 8, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 28, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 20, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 20, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 20, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Sep 19, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance