Drawing for SIDNEY FRANK BAGUETTE

USPTO serial 78478004

SIDNEY FRANK BAGUETTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIDNEY FRANK BAGUETTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Cornman

MICHAEL A CORNMAN SCHWEITZER CORNMAN GROSS & BONDELL LLP292 MADISON AVE FL 19NEW YORK, NY 10017-6313UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee, flour and preparations made from cereals, all kinds of bread, pastry, bakery goods, flavored ices, honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder, salt, mustard; pepper, vinegar, sauces, spicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 5, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 12, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 20, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2004CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2004GNPEEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2004CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Nov 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance