USPTO serial 78478800
FREIGHT HAULING LOGISTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3161056Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FREIGHT HAULING LOGISTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK A PASKAR
MARK A PASKAR BRYAN CAVE LLP1 METROPOLITAN SQ STE 3600SAINT LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | General cargo logistics management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2004 |
| 039 | Transportation services, namely, transportation of goods and parcels by truck, ocean and railway; shipping and freight forwarding; freight brokerage and forwarding of cargo; Supply chain logistics consulting services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Big Dog Enterprises Logistics LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Big Dog Enterprises Logistics LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named FREIGHT HAULING LOGISTICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |