CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CYGNUS

USPTO serial 78478894

CYGNUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CYGNUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry F. Soalt

Barry F. Soalt Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savitch LLP530 B Street, Suite 2100San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Wireless communication components, namely, wireless semiconductor and silicon chips, IP cores for wireless communication, software for wireless communication, and electronic modules for the purpose of processing wireless communicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 29, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 11, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 11, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 28, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 28, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 1, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 1, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 1, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 5, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 10, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 6, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 5, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 4, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 4, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance