USPTO serial 78479087
THE PLANTATION SHUTTER & BLIND COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRODY, DANIEL S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE PLANTATION SHUTTER & BLIND COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEWIS A. COMBS JR.
LEWIS A COMBS JR3002 W GALLAHER FERRY RDKNOXVILLE, TN 37932-1021UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | NON METALLIC WINDOW BLINDS, PLANTATION SHUTTERS, SHADES AND CUSTOM WINDOW COVERINGS CONSISTING OF WOOD, FABRICS AND /0R SYNTHETIC MATERIALS INCLUDING PLASTICS AND WOOD ALLOY MATERIAL | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1995 |
| 020 | METALLIC WINDOW BLINDS, MINI BLINDS AND VERTICAL BLINDS AND CUSTOM WINDOW COVERINGS CONSISTING OF ALUMINUM | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1995 |
| 037 | SERVICES CONSISTING OF CONSULTATION, INSTALLATION AND MEASURING OF CUSTOM WINDOW COVERINGS | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SERVIES, JAMES R.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named THE PLANTATION SHUTTER & BLIND COMPANY
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |