CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LALA VIVE

USPTO serial 78479881

LALA VIVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LALA VIVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Murphy

JOHN M. MURPHY Arochi, Marroquín & Lindner, S.C.5802 Bob Bullock (Loop 20)Building C1-56YILaredo, TX 78041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Milk and milk products, namely, ultra-pasteurized milk, skim milk, whole milk, flavored milk, de-lactose milk and low fat milk, natural and cottage cheese, ricotta cheese, cream cheese, pasteurized creamACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 31, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 31, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 31, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 31, 2008CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 17, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 17, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2008FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 11, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 4, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 4, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 4, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 14, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 16, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 14, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 3, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 6, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 6, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 22, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 27, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance