CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for FROM PROSPECT TO PAYCHECK

USPTO serial 78480376

FROM PROSPECT TO PAYCHECK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARKE, NANCY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FROM PROSPECT TO PAYCHECK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles E. Weinstein, Esq.

Charles E. Weinstein, Esq. Foley Hoag LLP155 Seaport BoulevardSeaport World Trade Center WestBoston, MA 02210

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for design and management of employee compensation programs, and user manuals sold as a unit therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 7, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 26, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 22, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 22, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 13, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 8, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 29, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 27, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 27, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 22, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 30, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 12, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 12, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 12, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 17, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 9, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 2, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 5, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance