Drawing for EL YOGHURT DE BUENA LECHE

USPTO serial 78480607

EL YOGHURT DE BUENA LECHE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EL YOGHURT DE BUENA LECHE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John M. Murphy

JOHN M. MURPHY Arochi, Marroquín & Lindner, S.C.5802 Bob Bullock (Loop 20)Building C1-56YILaredo, TX 78041

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Milk and milk products, namely, ultra-pastuerized milk, skim milk, whole milk, flavored milk, de-lactose milk and low fat milk, natural and flavored yoghurts, cottage cheese, ricotta cheese, cream cheese, pasteurized creamACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jul 7, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jul 7, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Jan 9, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Jan 9, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jul 9, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jul 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 14, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 14, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
May 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Oct 12, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 14, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 14, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 25, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 2, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
May 2, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 2, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 10, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 8, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 2, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 5, 2005GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED
Apr 5, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Apr 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 15, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance