USPTO serial 78481905
BARRIERSAFE SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3373794Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 22, 2008
- Examiner
- BRACEY, KAREN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BARRIERSAFE SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RENO, NV
Reno, NV
Reno, NV
Reno, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Raymond R. Moser, Jr.
Raymond R. Moser, Jr. Moser Taboada1030 Broad Street - Suite 203Shrewsbury, NJ 07702UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MICROFLEX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Microflex Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Microflex Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Microflex Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named BARRIERSAFE SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 22, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 30, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 27, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |